mfcb said:
HW60 wrote:
...That leads to a "yes" for the next years to come and a "don't know" afterwards...
i am absolutely the same opinion as HW60 (not only with the quoted main point)
Understood. It shouldn't be too difficult for us to keep porting cross-platform engine improvements to WM at least, the main problem is in investing development resources specifically in WM for things like touch-friendly UI redesign - it's already almost impossible to buy a new non-phone WM handheld, and with Windows Phone 7 just around the corner I suspect within a year you'll no longer be easily able to find a Windows Mobile phone either - the HD Mini appears to have been HTC's final WM device.
But thankfully, this isn't like wasting a year putting Pleco 2.0 on Palm OS, the improvements are a lot more minor and less time-consuming, and programming-wise while the UI may feel kind of backwards the underlying capabilities of WM devices are still pretty comparable to those of iPhone / Android devices (and hence easier to keep supporting). And there's always the chance that Windows Phone 7 may turn out to be capable of running Windows Mobile apps with a straightforward ROM hack - it's still based on WinCE after all - in which case there could be a considerable uptick in interest in our WM software again.
sfrrr said:
If/when it does break, if Pleco is no longer supporting WM and has no Android version, I'll buy myself a cheap used iPhone and use the Apple version for Pleco (and probably nothing else--don't really like the way the iPhone works).
Thanks, though while flattering, the willingness of Android users to buy iPods just to run Pleco actually diminishes the argument for developing an Android version
thph2006 said:
I'm curious, your phrasing sounds like most of your WM customers have moved to iPhone. Is that the case?
Pretty much - the rate of WM/Palm-to-iPhone transfers remains fairly steady, and we saw a big drop in WM sales in Q2 along with a big(ger) gain in iPhone sales; we think that may have had something to do with introducing flashcards on iPhone, at which point that officially became the version to get for people buying new hardware to run Pleco.
thph2006 said:
I'm done paying for mobile platform/carrier specific apps. If my need is critical enough to spend real money on (like the $100 for Pleco) I'll buy the best app I can find for Windows 7 desktop and just run it on one of the W7 tablet/hand-held devices coming out in the future giving me long-term investment protection. What I won't do again is invest in an application where there's a likelihood support for my platform will be dropped because of the ever-changing state of the mobile phone market, especially when it forces me to choose both a new hardware vendor and potentially lock into an undesirable wireless carrier. At least on Windows I know my app will work essentially forever.
I certainly understand your frustration - it's 10x worse on this end, I'd much much rather have spent the last year-and-a-half working on adding features on WM than rewriting the same darn program again for a different platform (or possibly two). Investing $100 in an application that might drop support for your platform is bad, investing several orders of magnitude more money than that in
developing an application for a platform whose
manufacturer drops support for it is even worse. (as happened on both Palm and WM about a year apart, though at least Palm had the decency to make some attempt at backwards-compatibility - Microsoft just plain screwed us, which is why I found myself feeling a bit of schadenfreude when the Kin turned into the latest iteration of Microsoft Bob)
We try to make it a bit easier on our customers by allowing free platform transfers whenever we can (though it does complicate matters somewhat on the business end) but we're very much hoping that the market will finally stabilize soon so that we can stop having to chase the latest mobile platforms and just focus all of our energies on making our software better.